The reading of the decision of the process investigating the death of Sarah Carreira is scheduled for March 27.

Tony Carreira accused MP of ‘just a pathetic resume’

Tony Carreira felt as he left the court that the MP “just had a pathetic resume” about the accident that killed his daughter Sarah Carreira.

“I’m just here to listen, I’m not here with a sense of revenge, I’m only here to understand. I owe this to the memory of my daughter. if it is true”.

The reading of the decision is scheduled for March 27.

The reading of the decision was scheduled for March 27 at 14.00.

Ivo Lucas’ lawyer blames Paulo Neves for crash

Ivo Lucas’ lawyer said he had “serious doubts” that “any criminal charge” against Paulo Neves could be ruled out. “Anyone will say that the cause of everything was the one who was driving with an alcohol norm of 1.36,” he said.

“Cause and effect is again key in the process. If Christina could not avoid the collision, then Ivo could not. In addition, after this, a second collision occurs, ”he added.

The lawyer asked Ivo not to accuse him of the murder.

Lawyer Paulo Neves argues lack of facts remains

“The lack of facts regarding the crime of negligence remains,” lawyer Paulo Neves defended.

Lawyer asks Cristina Branco not to prosecute for negligent homicide or violation of ordinances

Cristina Branco’s lawyer asked that the fado singer not be held accountable for either the crime or the violation of the regulations.

He also claimed that Paulo Neves “was the one who provoked the first confrontation” and that “he alone can be blamed for the end result, which was Sarah’s death.”

Cristina Branco’s defense claims the fado singer is ‘not responsible’

Regarding the GNR report indicating that there are no brake marks at the scene, Cristina Branco’s lawyer argues that because “the car has ABS, there are no brake marks on the pavement.”

“She does not bear any responsibility, she could not do anything else,” he added.

“She could not regulate the speed of this driver,” defends Christina Branco’s lawyer.

“The first collision was due to the fact that she was driving at a speed below the minimum. She could not adjust to the speed of this driver,” said the lawyer of the fado singer.

Cristina Branco’s lawyer believes the fado performer “fulfilled all the rules”

Cristina Branco’s lawyer believes that the fado singer “fulfilled all the norms”. “Circling at the speed of an agricultural tractor [o Paulo Neves]”, he decided.

“The speed was imperceptible and was not fixed, the turn signals were not turned on. The minimum turnover limit is to avoid collisions. He was drunk, four hours later he had alcohol,” he added.

“It was gross negligence on the part of Paulo Neves,” Magalhaes and Silva said.

Magalhães e Silva believes that both Paulo Neves and Cristina Branco should have placed the triangle in what would have been a “double crash signal”.

“In fact, no one set a triangle. It was gross negligence on the part of Neves,” he added.

Sarah’s parents’ spokesperson insists Paulo Neves is criminally responsible

Magalhães e Silva, a spokesperson for Sarah Carreira’s parents, insists on criminal responsibility for Paulo Neves, stating that “the murder must be committed in a gross manner and not by negligence.” He says that the cause of the accident was the behavior of Neves.

“Paulo Neves had to signal his presence. He was 80 meters away from the fado singer. This created public coverage of a double jeopardy. He was on the inside and the behavior he envisioned,” Magalhães and Silva said.

“At stake is the speed with which he followed, and then the non-placement of the triangle,” he added.

The deputy understands that the charge must be kept

The prosecutor claims that Thiago Pacheco and Paulo Neves could be charged with “dangerous driving”. The deputy understands that the prosecution must be supported, and the defendants should be accused as they become available.

“Ivo Lucas has no chance of being excluded from this accident as the main culprit,” the deputy believes.

The prosecutor argues that the connection between the link and the causal link that exists between the speed of Paulo Neves and the accident of Cristina, the main reason is the speed with which Paulo Neves followed.

“The question is to know the causal relationship between the speed of Paulo Neves and the collision of Ivo Lucas, which is the final result.” There is a break in the causal relationship. But Kristina masters what leads to the first collision speeding,” said the prosecutor on behalf of the deputy.

“Ivo Lucas has no chance of being excluded from this accident as the main culprit. The fado singer has a share of responsibility. Ivo was driving at a speed of 130 km / h, the speed is over the top. A wall in the middle of the road,” he added.

The MP supports the charge of negligent homicide and failure to comply with an order against Cristina Branco

The prosecutor stated that “the clash could have been motivated” and that “she [fadista] included cruise control.

“I don’t see the possibility of imputing another other crime to her. I don’t think there is any force for imposing a triangle. The deputy claims both negligent murder and administrative offenses,” he added.

“You have to practice defensive driving,” the prosecutor says of Cristina Branco.

The prosecutor stated that the problems of interpretation begin with the analysis of the speeds Paulo Neves and Cristina Branco were driving.

“I didn’t see any car in front of Cristina in the crash footage, only Paulo Neves. There is a question about speeding, as he was unable to stop the car before the accident. If the speed was not excessive, he might have avoided the collision. No, I was expecting a car at 28km, but this can happen. You need to drive carefully, the other car might have a breakdown. The other car was visible from 400 meters, you could see it. But the floor was wet,” the prosecutor added.

MP’s prosecutor continues to press charges

“Paulo Neves has absolutely incredible behavior. He is driving on the highway at a speed of 28 kilometers per hour. This can lead to a severe accident. It never accelerated to the minimum speed required for highway driving. I don’t think she escaped reality. The speed difference of 80 km/h between the two cars was as if it had crashed into a wall,” the prosecutor said.

The prosecutor states that “the issue of causality between behavior and outcomes is the most important issue.”

“The deputy has positions on this issue, which can be criticized. These are the positions that I will take based on my thoughts and my neutral conscience,” the prosecutor’s office said.

“The issue of causality between behavior and outcomes is the most important issue,” he added.

MP says the behavior in question is a crime and a violation of the ordinance

“During the separation, there may be different decisions, and in case of conviction for a crime, this will lead to the abolition of an administrative offense,” the deputy said.

The former companion of the fado singer reported a phone call from Cristina Branco to her son

“Later she [Cristina Branco] calls the eldest son who was with me, the second accident has already happened. She could hardly speak. She passes the phone to her daughter Margarida, who also begins to cry. It wasn’t until the second phone call that I realized they were in the center tab. [e não na berma]”, – added the former companion of the fado singer.

Witness Cristina Branco speaks in court

“Christina called me from the girl’s phone, everything was very confusing. She said that she had just entered the A1 in Santarém. She had blood on her nose, but everything was fine. Everything was very fast, the goal was to call 112. I call when I try to describe the place, I realized that they were already calling for help at the place,” said Nuno Rocha.

Nuno Azevedo Rocha to make statements

Composer Nuno Rocha, former partner of Cristina Branco, will make a statement.

Fadista claims car collided with another overturned vehicle

“I saw two red lights right in front of me before the accident, I don’t know if it was presence or brakes. There is a car that is going to crash into an overturned car,” Cristina Branco said.

Cristina Branco did not put a triangle to signal an accident

“Given the circumstances, I could not signal an accident. If I put a triangle behind her, it wouldn’t work,” said Cristina Branco.

Fadista talks about the moment before the second match

“My car stayed in the center lane. Cars drove on both sides. Both lanes were clear. I’m sure I braked. And I put my right hand on my daughter’s chest. My perception is that I hit the wall and the car spins. . Instinct mother was to take her daughter and run away. I stayed to protect her, I will never leave her there alone. I have no idea how much time passed, it seemed like hours before the next crash, “said Cristina Branco. .

Fado singer Cristina Branco describes the accident

Fado singer Cristina Branco stated that she did not remember part of the accident. “I passed the Santarém toll gate and the next moment there was a collision,” he said.

“I’m talking on the phone 112, I’m holding my daughter, she says that now the car will break. I drive carefully, turn on the system, I see some lights, I slow down, an accident occurs. There was blood. on my face,” he said.

Sarah Carreira’s parents arrive at court

Sarah Carreira’s parents have already appeared before the court of Santarem.