Saturday, November 15, 2025

Creating liberating content

Introducing deBridge Finance: Bridging...

In the dynamic landscape of decentralized finance (DeFi), innovation is a constant,...

Hyperliquid Airdrop: Everything You...

The Hyperliquid blockchain is redefining the crypto space with its lightning-fast Layer-1 technology,...

Unlock the Power of...

Join ArcInvest Today: Get $250 in Bitcoin and a 30% Deposit Bonus to...

Claim Your Hyperliquid Airdrop...

How to Claim Your Hyperliquid Airdrop: A Step-by-Step Guide to HYPE Tokens The Hyperliquid...
HomeEntertainmentJulia by Sandra...

Julia by Sandra Newman Review: This powerful feminist retelling of Orwell’s 1984 tears the original apart

I was afraid it would be a feminist retelling of George Orwell’s totalitarian dystopia. 1984 (first published in 1949) may well have been a timely but useful literary experiment.

Modern readers have long complained that Julia, the sex-obsessed lover of Winston Smith’s protagonist, is exploited by the male gaze. In the Age of Feminist Retellings (Madeleine Miller) Circe to Natasha Solomon Honest Rosalina) Julia was definitely late and just had to rewrite: Katherine Bradley Sisterhood: A potboiler romance in the boss lady style.

But Sandra Newman is an impressive writer, and her work Julia, sanctioned by Orwell’s legacy, is neither an anachronistic betrayal of the source material nor a stale scholarly exercise. “Julia” is a lively, full-fledged book that retains the spirit of the original, but tears apart its elements, namely the character of Winston Smith.

First of all, it’s very funny. K.S. Lewis was accused in 1984 of not being funny, but he couldn’t say the same. The prose is recognizably austere, like Orwell’s (Newman is a master parodist, having created an entire dialect for her long list of women’s awards). Ice Star Land), but is also peppered with new observations that made me laugh, including a particularly snarky conversation with a pointless party member about sausages.

It comes from the same dystopian England now known as Airstrip One. 1984where party members working to erase history in the ministries of truth, peace, abundance and love are constantly interrogated through “television screens” on the streets, in offices and at home.

They are encouraged to use the mind-numbing new language of Newspeak. Julia lives in a women’s home, where she has even less privacy than Winston has in his apartment. If they break the rules by having sex or even thinking something against the party, they may disappear.

The practical qualities with which Orwell endowed Julia are transformed here into an entertaining ploy. Julia always finds ways to improve the system. She tells people that she is “not at all intelligent” even though she is clearly smarter than them.

She politely asks TV screeners to look away while she transforms, both to amuse the other girls (“it was supposed to send every male comrade running within earshot”) and to hand over read illegal banknotes (“she counted on them.” below to divert attention from her hands”). Men don’t know the real life of women. “Disease: Menstruation” is “a privilege used and abused by all girls” as guards confuse plumbing tools with antiques.

However, not everything is so carefree. Julia is a much more volatile, raw and violent book than Orwell’s, dealing with physical issues that probably never occurred to him. After their first sexual encounter, Winston lies “like a cat that has been creamed.”

Meanwhile, Julia is worried about her pregnancy. There are clogged toilets with substandard menstrual wipes and an early scene with a deeply disturbing and disgusting depiction of a belated miscarriage.

There are flashbacks to Julia’s childhood, her painful introduction to sex, the death of her parents, and her naive role in the anti-capitalist revolution. Newman writes: “They spoke as if talking were the real business of life and that the world’s problems would soon be solved if only they were approached in the right way.”

This is certainly the case with Winston, who talks about who invented the airplane, while Julia, a woman of action, tries to survive. Julia admires his “strange obsession with truth.” The intellectual pursuits that seemed most important in 1984 seem like a self-indulgent luxury here.

Newman takes on all the big hits from Orwell’s book: the torture in Room 101, the last meeting between Julia and Winston.

But what’s great about it is not only its portrayal of Julia, who is even smarter than you think (when she told Winston she cheated on him, she wasn’t kidding), but also the full understanding of what Orwell meant by these three social relationship. were locked in an endless battle for dominance. Julia, who lives in this pressure cooker, is often cruel and harsh. In the end, she is the one who understands.

Doubleplusgood, as the residents of Runway One would say.

Source: I News

Get notified whenever we post something new!

Continue reading

Cillian Murphy is the anti-star character Hollywood needs

When Cillian Murphy took the stage at the Golden Globes on Sunday night, his nose was smeared with his wife's lipstick, as if a door had opened in Hollywood's Neverland and an ambassador from the real world had walked...

The Golden Globes confirm it: Barbie was a bad movie and a marketing masterpiece.

The Golden Globes ceremony has long been a volatile event, with judges regularly making confusing decisions that can undermine the awards' credibility to the point of rendering them irrelevant. But last night they finally did something right by...

Golden Globes: Oppenheimer, Bad Things and The Inheritance Dominate Awards

OppenheimerEpic gothic comedy by Christopher Nolan Poor things received top honors at the Golden Globes, and the final season Continuity took the best drama. 180 minutes Oppenheimer was named best drama film by about 300 entertainment journalists voting at...