Tuesday, November 18, 2025

Creating liberating content

Introducing deBridge Finance: Bridging...

In the dynamic landscape of decentralized finance (DeFi), innovation is a constant,...

Hyperliquid Airdrop: Everything You...

The Hyperliquid blockchain is redefining the crypto space with its lightning-fast Layer-1 technology,...

Unlock the Power of...

Join ArcInvest Today: Get $250 in Bitcoin and a 30% Deposit Bonus to...

Claim Your Hyperliquid Airdrop...

How to Claim Your Hyperliquid Airdrop: A Step-by-Step Guide to HYPE Tokens The Hyperliquid...
HomeEntertainmentLegacy, Sherlock Holmes,...

Legacy, Sherlock Holmes, Harry Potter: A brief history of spoilers

What was your worst spoiler experience? Wherein Kulturagentur, we got our share. The time someone submitted their Game of Thrones A review without warning, the first line of which revealed all about the death of Jon Snow. Time of the fifth Harry Potter the book was published, and a girl from the school group approached culture editor Sarah Carson and announced, “I see. Read it. Know who is dying.” Or time crashed into my memory as the sixth Harry Potter The book is published, and someone has hung a half-meter banner over the A442 with the inscription “PERD FROG DIE”. I learned from this news roundwhich he sensitively disappeared.

Today, we don’t need light-hearted reviewers, upstarts brandishing their flutes, or sadistic bullies telling us the endings of the stories we care about the most. If you use social media, spoilers for your favorite shows will be displayed. successor Unpleasant happy valleyare practically inevitable without joint efforts. If you are even 24 hours behind the general viewing schedule, you risk ruining your experience by simply registering. Monday morning at 5am, a few hours after the third episode successor was released in the UK, it was trending on Twitter – one click would show the biggest death on TV since Gus Fring. breaking Bad.

Because it’s so easy to stumble upon a spoiler online, there is now a strict etiquette for posting major plot points in TV shows, books, and movies. Spoiler Warnings is rife with reviews, articles, and Reddit posts that contain details that should come as a heartbreaking surprise. But what was before the Internet?

Spoiler fear often goes back to the classic gothic novel by Wilkie Collins. Woman in white. It was originally published in Charles Dickens’ magazine in 1859 for 10 months. It was published in its entirety in a three-part set in 1860, but Collins feared that this would mean anyone could read the entire story and spoil it for others. In the preface to this edition, he wrote to future critics: “If this book is discussed, I dare to ask, is it possible to praise or blame the author without opening the case, telling his story from second hand? […] Will he do the reader a favor by first destroying the two main elements of the charm of all stories: the interest of curiosity and the excitement of surprise? You see, the critics complied, and many in their reviews realized that it was unfair to reveal too much about what was happening.

So the concept has been around for many years, but the first recorded use of the word was in an American magazine. national lantern in 1971. In contrast to Collins, who believed that excitement was key to the experience of reading his book, Douglas K. Kenny wrote that “the average American has more anxiety in his life than he can handle in a healthy way.” from major storylines and twists and turns from dozens of books and films: Psycho, Casablanca, Sherlock Holmes secrets, Jane Eyre, 1984. Either way, it saves a lot of time; Agatha Christie cards on the table can be conveniently expressed in three words: “Dr. Roberts did it.”

Take Kenny’s anti-stress example: some of us mess things up. Even those same colleagues, horrified by less-than-perfect spoilers, admit to reading American series before they hit the UK, or watching horror movie plots before watching them to make them a little less scary. . When I was growing up, I had a friend who resolutely read the last page of every book she picked up, because if it didn’t have a happy ending, she wasn’t interested.

Wash it with favor for the future successor spectators to daily mail Decided to publish a front page today with the headline “Farewell, foul-mouthed tyrant whose life (and death) was so dramatic you couldn’t make it up” and helpfully add “Logan Roy: 1938-2023”? Spoiler: it’s not.

Source: I News

Get notified whenever we post something new!

Continue reading

Cillian Murphy is the anti-star character Hollywood needs

When Cillian Murphy took the stage at the Golden Globes on Sunday night, his nose was smeared with his wife's lipstick, as if a door had opened in Hollywood's Neverland and an ambassador from the real world had walked...

The Golden Globes confirm it: Barbie was a bad movie and a marketing masterpiece.

The Golden Globes ceremony has long been a volatile event, with judges regularly making confusing decisions that can undermine the awards' credibility to the point of rendering them irrelevant. But last night they finally did something right by...

Golden Globes: Oppenheimer, Bad Things and The Inheritance Dominate Awards

OppenheimerEpic gothic comedy by Christopher Nolan Poor things received top honors at the Golden Globes, and the final season Continuity took the best drama. 180 minutes Oppenheimer was named best drama film by about 300 entertainment journalists voting at...