Wednesday, August 13, 2025

Creating liberating content

Introducing deBridge Finance: Bridging...

In the dynamic landscape of decentralized finance (DeFi), innovation is a constant,...

Hyperliquid Airdrop: Everything You...

The Hyperliquid blockchain is redefining the crypto space with its lightning-fast Layer-1 technology,...

Unlock the Power of...

Join ArcInvest Today: Get $250 in Bitcoin and a 30% Deposit Bonus to...

Claim Your Hyperliquid Airdrop...

How to Claim Your Hyperliquid Airdrop: A Step-by-Step Guide to HYPE Tokens The Hyperliquid...
HomeWorldIn the United...

In the United States, principles have been proposed to regulate the genetic modification of organisms.

In the United States, principles have been proposed to regulate the genetic modification of organisms.

The basic principles for regulating the gene editing work of organisms for agricultural purposes were proposed by L. Val Giddings, senior researcher at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF), on March 19 in a paper published on the Center’s website. for a New American Security (CNAS).

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are an extremely important part of American agriculture. For example, almost all varieties of corn grown in the United States are the product of genetic engineering.

Giddings argues that current regulations governing DNA recombination research are slowing the development of the industry and could deprive the United States of leadership in this field. To maintain this leadership, he proposes to base it on the following principles:

1. The rules must serve the security of the research. Giddings suggests refraining from regulating for commercial advantage or enforcing land use patterns.

2. Prohibitions should mainly concern proven and significant dangers, such as the entry of toxins, allergens or infections into the body. New and unknown dangers are, in his opinion, extremely rare.

3. Products with no known danger should be removed from regulation. Current regulations on genetic modification assume a risk without specifying a specific hazard or a likely scenario for its occurrence.

4. According to the scientist, it will not be possible to reduce the risk to zero and we just have to work to reduce it. One can only argue about where to draw the line of risk tolerance.

5. You should focus only on relative risk and not absolute risk. In other words, Giddings writes, one should compare the dangers of an existing solution with a new one. In his opinion, it is necessary to abolish rules requiring absolute risk assessment when conducting research.

Furthermore, the expert proposes to stop regulating technologies and demonstrate that the already known dangers are taken into account. Regulators, when evaluating new technologies, should not require answers to questions that do not change the risks.

Source: Rossa Primavera

Get notified whenever we post something new!

Continue reading

The head of the Abkhazian Foreign Ministry assessed the relations between Russia and Georgia

It is in Abkhazia's interest to develop relations between Russia and Georgia, Abkhaz Foreign Minister Sergei Shamba said at a briefing on September 3."I think it is in our interest to see things develop normally. I do not believe...

The head of the Abkhazian Foreign Ministry called on the Russian Federation to consider how to improve relations with the Russian Federation

Abkhaz political forces need to think together about how to improve relations with Russia, which have begun to deteriorate, Abkhaz Foreign Minister Sergei Shamba said at a briefing on September 3.He commented on a document that appeared on social...

Sports Minister Degtyarev punished a State Duma deputy for changing citizenship

State Duma deputies who previously changed their sports citizenship are disgusting, Russian Sports Minister Mikhail Degtyarev said on September 4 during a speech at the EEF-2024 forum.Degtyarev said he was not against Russian athletes taking part in international competitions...