The neurologist said the retired optometrist who is suing Gwyneth Paltrow for hitting him on a ski slope had signs of brain damage prior to the incident.
Terry Sanderson, 76, sued the Oscar winner, alleging she was out of control when she ran into him at a Deer Valley resort in Utah in 2016 before leaving. According to him, he had broken ribs and serious head injuries.
At a hearing Wednesday in Park City, Utah, Dr. Carl Black, an expert in neuroradiology, said he reviewed images of Sanderson’s brain taken before and after the accident.
Dr. Black told the court that he found no evidence of brain injury in post-crash images and noted that he had seen damage in images taken prior to 2016.
He said MRI scans before the accident showed the retiree’s brain was showing signs of “white matter disease,” the wear and tear on nerve tissue that can be caused by aging.
“So you see the same state of the brain before and after the accident?” Mrs. Paltrow’s lawyer asked.
“For 11 years,” said D. Cherny. He added that he believed Mr Sanderson’s head injury was “very minor”.
Ms. Paltrow’s lawyer questioned whether Mr. Sanderson’s recurring symptoms were due to this progressive, age-related brain damage that the doctor referred to. Black answered “correctly”.
Tuesday has Shakespeare in love Star’s legal team announced that it would call on four more experts for the defense on the seventh day of the trial. Brad Falchuk, husband of television producer Ms. Paltrow, is also expected to testify.
Mr Sanderson is suing an American actress for $300,000 (£244,000). Ms. Paltrow denies she ran into him and says he ran into her from behind. She sues him for a $1 bill plus her legal fees.
slime The founder stated that she and her family lost “half a day of skiing” in the collision.
Her two children, who were both on a skiing holiday, were read out in court on Tuesday.
Her daughter Apple Martin, now 18, said her mother was “in shock” after the skiing accident and had to leave the slopes for a massage because of the pain.
Last week, Ms. Paltrow said the ski collision was not her fault. Her defense used a series of digital animations to illustrate the actress’s version of events, as well as a panel of experts including a biomedical engineer, a collision expert, a doctor, and a ski instructor.
The animations were not included as forensic evidence, but Mr. Sanderson’s lawyers objected to their inclusion, arguing that Ms. Paltrow’s team was trying to mislead the jury.
Mr. Sanderson claimed that it was she who made his career.
“There was nothing for me… I just remember that everything was perfect, and then I heard something that I had never heard in a ski resort,” he told the court, testifying earlier this week, adding that he had a “chilling soul cry.” “. .
“It was like someone lost control, crashed into a tree and died, and that was the case with me until I got hit,” he said.
Both sides are expected to present closing arguments on Thursday before the jury deliberates and makes a decision later that day or on Friday.
Source: I News
I am Michael Melvin, an experienced news writer with a passion for uncovering stories and bringing them to the public. I have been working in the news industry for over five years now, and my work has been published on multiple websites. As an author at 24 News Reporters, I cover world section of current events stories that are both informative and captivating to read.